Statism in the way of downsizing
by
Dr. Manzur Ejaz 
        As a result of the government's confrontation with the judiciary, political instability has returned to Pakistan. More importantly, the economic programme initiated by the government -- that should have been its main focus -- has started to
unravel because of the perceived vulnerability of the ruling party due to the suspension of the 14th Amendment. After regaining their freedom to speak, MNAs from the ruling party promptly joined the opposition in targeting the government's downsizing efforts, which were considered essential to improve the country's fiscal viability, rehabilitate pivotal
institutions, reduce inflation and restart economic activity.

        It goes without saying that, for good or for bad, agreements with the IMF hinge upon downsizing. If abandoned, the agreements might fall apart. The government has already put downsizing on hold in its cabinet meeting on November 6.
Restructuring of the state is failing once again. The ruling elite, being the main beneficiary of the overgrown state, will do their best to undermine any restructuring effort.

        Opposition parties usually try to put the government in a tight spot when it follows an essential but not-so-popular economic programme. During Benazir Bhutto's second government (1993-96) the PML and its allies followed a well-designed strategy to paralyse the economic activity by "Payyah Jam", "Najaat Day" strikes and other
tactics. Every month markets were forced to close for several days, damaging the economy beyond repair.

        Theoretically, the PML and the PPP do not differ on privatisation and other economic measures needed for economic salvation. The former government of the PPP might not have pursued the implementation of these programmes (downsizing,
privatisation, etc.,) as vigorously as the present government, but there was no divergence in the approach used in handling the economy. These parties, therefore, use disaffection of different sections of the population as political tools.

        The main problem is that the political elite do not look beyond winning the elections and enjoying the perks that come with power. They do not take the issue of governance seriously and mindlessly oppose every move by the government
without realising how much damage they will do to the economy, and whether the economy  can be revived even if they come to power.

        The opposition always adopts the statist view i.e., blaming the government for not protecting the weak and vulnerable sections through state institutions. However, none has asked questions about the state's capacity to solve these problems.

        Ironically, everyone knows that the Pakistani state is overgrown, overbearing and dysfunctional: it cannot improve the conditions of the masses even if it wants to.  Interestingly, most among the public fall in one or the other category
of 'statists' (believers in a strong state). Following are some of these categories:

        -- Elitist statism: Pakistan's ruling elite have been the main beneficiaries of the state's control of economic organisations, its ownership of different types of wealth (land and other natural resources) and its ability to transfer this wealth.  Getting huge loans from nationalised financial institutions and then getting them written off, or simply refusing to
pay them, is what most of them do. In the last 50 years the state has transferred huge amounts of wealth in the form of land grants, permits, subsidised agricultural and industrial loans for the benefit of feudalists, industrialists and civil
and military
bureaucracy.

        -- Rent seekers' statism: Enrollment on the state pay-roll has been a source of unearned income, known as rent seeking, or corruption. There is no other sector of the economy where one can enrich oneself by just being enlisted in a
certain service.

        -- Ideological statism: The support of ideological statists is not largely based on narrowly-defined self-interest (or selfishness) but it is a philosophical approach to re-engineer society. Despite the failure of statism in many countries,
socialists and the enlightened elite still espouses that state is (or should be) the first and the last provider. The population is conceived, largely comprising orphans (citizens) needing parenthood of the state to defend it from the cruel and greedy rich and to provide feed and shelter: the state is also taken to be an employment agency.

        However, the Jamaat-i-Islami, after increasing its influence in the trade unions of the state-owned enterprises has become the new champion of statism. It has consistently opposed downsizing and streamlining of major enterprises like Railways,  PIA, Wapda, etc. Like socialists, it strongly believes in social re-engineering and has accommodated statism in its PPP-style populist agenda.

        -- Petty statism: This manifests itself in theft of state-supplied services like electricity, telephone services, irrigation water, etc. This is happening when most of the people are getting no benefits from the state in any way. Despite endless
victimisation at the hands of the state, they continue to believe that it is the state that has the ultimate solutions. They look towards the state as benevolent omnipotent entity that will, ultimately, come to their rescue. They are unable to grasp the essence of the state and continue believing that, one day, a benevolent ruler will capture the state and use it for the good of the people.

        In summary, one can say that most of the ruling elite have a vested interest in keeping the state in its present form. Enlightened elite, religious ideologues and the people continue to believe in a strong state. The forces in favour of paring
down the state are weak and vulnerable. It is not difficult to win against them, particularly during unstable political times.

        It appears that the Nawaz Sharif government, due to economic necessities and pressure of international agencies, had begun to downsize and restructure the state.   However, because of its political vulnerability, it has started to
backtrack. Now, with the rising clout of the legislators, it will be unable to take any meaningful action to reform any institution: it will be opposed by one or another group of powerful political lobbies. The status quo will continue and rehabilitation of the economy will remain a far cry.